How To Criticize The Journal Article
JOURNAL TITLE
Inflation ,
openness , and exchange-rate regimes The quest for short-term commitment
(Alfaro, L. 2005)
How do openness and exchange-rate regimes affect inflation
(Ghosh, A. 2014)
Journal
Article Critique
Alfaro, L. (2005). Inflation , openness , and
exchange-rate regimes The quest for short-term commitment. Journal of
Development Economics, 77, 229–249.
doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.02.006
Ghosh, A. (2014). How do openness and exchange-rate regimes
affect in fl ation ? International Review of Economics and Finance, 34,
190–202. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2014.08.008
Propose of study
The abstract for both of the
study was made clear that is first study by (Alfaro, 2005) investigates the
further tests Romer’s [Romer, D., 1993. Openness and inflation: theory and
evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 58, 869–903] extension of Kydland and
Prescott’s [Kydland, F., Prescott, E., 1977 Rules rather than discretion: the
inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85, 473–491] predictions
for dynamic inconsistency problems in open economies. Similarly, In the (Ghosh, 2014) study the abstract
was made clear that is investigates the effect of openness and exchange rate
regimes on inflation for 137 countries from 1999 to 2012.
However, the title of the
study (Alfaro, 2005) is not completely
clear. The purpose of authoring was not clearly show the inflation as the
dependent variable in this study. Perhaps a better title would be How do
openness and exchange rate regimes affect inflation for example (Ghosh, 2014) study similar topic
but difference with difference approach.
In the introduction both (Alfaro, 2005) and (Ghosh, 2014) state that the study
was further tests Romer’s [Romer, D., 1993. Openness and inflation: theory and
evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 58, 869–903] extension of Kydland and
Prescott’s (1977). (Alfaro, 2005) stated Romer argues
that the negative openness–inflation relationship arises from the dynamic
inconsistency of discretionary monetary policy and further explained by (Ghosh, 2014) greater openness
acts as an implicit commitment mechanism by providing a disincentive for
policymakers to engage in surprise monetary expansion, and leads to lower
inflation (Romer, 1993).
The article was
representative by a good extent the abstract and in the correct form. Who reads
it can understand the overall purpose and method of the study. Hence, in the
introduction the purpose of the study was made clearly both in (Alfaro, 2005) and (Ghosh, 2014).
Problem
addressed by the study
According to (Alfaro, 2005) in referring to
Romer’s (1993) that inflation and openness are negatively and significantly
correlated. Similarly, (Ghosh, 2014) greater openness
acts as an implicit commitment mechanism by providing a disincentive for
policymakers to engage in surprise monetary expansion, and leads to lower
inflation (Romer, 1993). However, (Alfaro, 2005) reported Romer’s
empirical work, using cross-country averages spanning more than a decade
(beginning in 1973), tests the long-run commitment effect of openness on
restricting the usefulness of discretionary monetary policy. Furthermore, (Alfaro, 2005) add that whether
openness or other mechanisms bind in a short-term horizon. Differ from (Alfaro, 2005), (Ghosh, 2014) add that the
political economy literature. Known as the “compensation hypothesis,” it posits
that more openness exposes a nation to greater social and economic
inequalities. This generates a public outcry for social spending aimed at
offsetting the social costs of international integration. To avoid economic and
political crises, governments respond by providing more social spending to
ensure more economic parity in the face of higher openness. This result and
social compensation stimulates higher consumer spending and hence creates more
inflation (Kaufman & Segura-Ubiergo, 2001). Both studies investigate
possible ways of improving this situation.
Crystal clear question stated by the
study to be answered. It aimed to explore the main research question: To take
advantage of the time dimension of the data to analyze whether openness serves
as a commitment mechanism for restraining inflation in the short run for (Alfaro, 2005). Meanwhile, (Ghosh, 2014) to examine the role
of regimes within a framework disaggregated to economic development, extent of
trade openness, capital controls or inflation levels.
The study deal with an objective which
is important in the field of monetary economic which is monetary policy
setting. Partially it is investigating how openness effecting inflation in
short run and the robustness by adding another determinant into the model. This
is an issue which is focused recently since the whole world is integrated. It
also provide the information for future research as well the body of policy.
The
design used in the study
The full sample covers 130 countries
from 1973 to 1998 (Alfaro, 2005) provide 2000 over
observation show the data can assume as normally distribute. Similarly, (Ghosh, 2014) The full dataset
uses annual data encapsulating 137 countries from 1999 to 2012 as 1781
observation. The sample size was enough to conduct short run and long run
analysis for these study to determine the exactly relationship between openness
and inflation.
Alfaro, (2005) follow Romer’s
estimation strategy by regressing inflation on a constant, the degree of
openness, other control variables, and an error term. Meanwhile, (Ghosh, 2014) was use pairwise
correlation in order to determine the relationship between inflation and it determinant. The
study by (Alfaro, 2005) does not conducting unit root test before ordinary
least square analysis running. These cause the spurious regression which high
r-square show there strong relationship but most of the variable insignificant
short the model was has spurious regression and the unit root test should be
conduct to solve the problem on non-stationary. For some of the indicator in
the
Fix effect model solved the omitted
variable which the cross-section analysis might by driven by time-invariant
omitted variables, such as institutional variables, that often are difficult to
measure. The wide perspective with included in the model (Alfaro, 2005). Contrarily, to (Ghosh, 2014) which is does not
include the omitted variable in model.
Unit root test (Adf) test should address
before run other test in order to avoid the spurious regression in the model
and for better understanding short run relation the co-intergation analysis and
as well vector error correction model can use to satisfy the objection of the
study which to determine the short run relationship between openness and
inflation. Ghosh, (2014) not clearly
mentioned the method use in the study.
Result
According
to study the negative correlation persists even after adding more than a decade
of observations over Romer’s work (Alfaro, 2005). The average
inflation in fixed regimes to be higher than in floating regimes for both the
de jure and de facto classifications(Alfaro, 2005). The coefficient on
openness is negative and highly significant(Alfaro, 2005). The income per
capita estimate, however, is not significant. Column (4) shows the results to
be robust to using exports as a share of GDP as the openness measure (Alfaro, 2005). The openness
coefficient, however, remains negative and significant even when controlling
for regional differences, the development level, and fiscal deficits. Similar
results, not reported due to space considerations, are obtained using exports
as a share of GDP(Alfaro, 2005). (Ghosh, 2014) find higher capital
account openness as well as a movement towards a fixed regime to lower
inflation. However, there is no clear evidence of a significant negative effect
of trade openness on inflation, except for nations with low trade openness and
high inflation rates. This suggests that important country-specific effects
might be driving these results (Alfaro, 2005). The model has the
additional appeal that it captures the effect of several unobserved factors
(like political and institutional events) on inflation, that are available for
only a sub- set of countries and for a limited time period (Ghosh, 2014). Alfaro, (2005) found cannot reject
the hypothesis that the GDP per capita variable has a unit root. Hence this
model has a spurious regression.
The
pooled OLS regression in Reg 2 shows the regime dummy and trade openness to be
negative and significant in influencing inflation much like the earlier
empirical literature on the inverse relationship (Ghosh, 2014). Openness loses its
statistical significance while the other variables hold the same sign and
significance. However, the RE model assumes that the error terms are
uncorrelated with the independent variables. Assumption relax by using a fixed
effect (FE) model with both country and time-fixed effects (Ghosh, 2014). Alfaro, (2005) found that openness
does not play a role in restricting inflation in the short run. On the other
hand, a fixed exchange-rate regime plays a significant role. The results are
robust to controlling for other variables that determine inflation, performing
sensitivity analysis, and using a de facto exchange rate regime classification
Majors
Conclusion
According
to the researcher, (Alfaro, 2005) found empirically
the non-significant role openness seems to play as a commitment mechanism in
the short term. Meanwhile, (Ghosh, 2014)found higher capital
account openness as well as a movement towards a fixed regime to lower
inflation. In Alfaro, (2005) Pegged exchange-rate
regimes, however, have been associated with significantly better inflation performance.
Ghosh, (2014) found there is no
clear evidence of a significant effect of trade openness to lower inflation,
except for nations with low levels of trade openness and high inflation rates.
According
to Alfaro, (2005) the negative and
strong relationship between inflation and a fixed exchange-rate regime is
consistent with the classical literature, which argues that fixed exchange-rate
regimes impose discipline on individual countries, reflecting the greater
observability, accountability, and transparency of the exchange rate over
openness.
Alfaro, (2005) argue there being a
stronger link between the exchange rate and inflation than between inflation
and openness in the short term, inflation might be more effectively restrained
through economic cooperation and by integrating the design of macroeconomic
policies consistent with maintaining fixed exchange rates. These consistent to
the second researcher Ghosh, (2014) who found increasing
degree of regime flexibility may lead to higher inflation, the concomitant use
of inflation targeting regime would provide a cushion in fighting against
inflation.
(Alfaro, 2005) in stated this paper
is not to advocate a specific type of exchange rate regime or a certain extent
of trade or financial openness over another but, acknowledged that such
external policy choices are country-specific. Rather the empirical evidence
provided here should be treated more as a policy guide in choosing a nation's
external orientation (Alfaro, 2005). Meanwhile (Ghosh, 2014) stated the message
of the paper is not that a peg inconsistent with fiscal and monetary policies
can achieve low, long-term, sustainable inflation. Rather, it argues that, in
the short run, a fixed exchange rate has served as a commitment mechanism and
thereby limited inflation.
Recommendation
In the overall, the both study we are
concerned about openness affected inflation. It offer to the monetary policy
maker to create right policy in short term (Alfaro, 2005) and also the
exchange rate regime how does it affected our inflation with (Ghosh, 2014) add capital as
determinant of inflation these will provide the more wide perspective on
inflation cause.
Unit root test (Adf) test should address
before run other test in order to avoid the spurious regression in the model
and for better understanding short run relation the co-integration analysis and
as well vector error correction model can use to satisfy the objection of the
study which to determine the short run relationship between openness and
inflation.
Another example for journal article critique click this http://rosamira178.blogspot.com/2015/05/journal-article-critique_21.html?m=1
No comments:
Post a Comment